Rep. Jim Matheson (D-Utah) called on the Department of Energy yesterday to justify its new approach for the Moab uranium mill tailings project that will entail workers only being employed on the project for a portion of each year. DOE and new Moab cleanup contractor Portage plan to implement a new approach for the project that will result in work being largely curtailed for three months during the winter each year, with Moab workers transferred to other jobs with Portage’s partner companies on the new Moab cleanup contract or laid off and rehired when work resumes. DOE has said the new approach is largely tied to funding issues, but in a letter to Secretary of Energy Steven Chu, Matheson questioned whether it’s the best use of available money. “The Administration’s decision to use a seasonal work schedule is not an efficient way to manage taxpayer dollars,” he wrote.
Matheson also questioned how much of the Moab’s project annual funding was going to oversight activities, rather than actual work. He wrote that “it is my understanding that more than 25 percent of the project’s funds will go to a Department field office located offsite for oversight,” adding, “While oversight is certainly a legitimate use of funds, using one out of every four tax dollars to oversee work that is being done only nine months out of the year appears excessive to me.”
Partner Content
Jobs