Nuclear Security & Deterrence Monitor Vol. 24 No. 32
Visit Archives | Return to Issue
PDF
Nuclear Security & Deterrence Monitor
Article 5 of 18
August 07, 2020

South Carolina, NNSA Could be Close to Settling $200M Plutonium Lawsuit

By Dan Leone

South Carolina and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) could be about to cut a deal in the state’s $200 million lawsuit over the federal government’s failure to remove plutonium from the Savannah River Site, court papers show.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted a joint motion to stay the case until Aug. 31. 

South Carolina says it is legally entitled to $200 million in economic assistance payments from the Department of Energy’s semiautonomous nuclear-weapon agency, which failed to meet a 2016 deadline set in federal law to start removing surplus weapon-usable plutonium from the state. The case is on appeal after the Court of Federal Claims supported the NNSA’s position that it cannot pay the money without a specific appropriation from Congress, which it has not received.

The case has been at this crossroads before, only to have settlement talks collapse amid complaints that the federal government offered what South Carolina considered a single, unserious offer.

The ongoing Federal Circuit appeal is to date South Carolina’s only legal lever for setting a floor on the economic benefit the state will reap from federal plutonium activities within its borders. During oral arguments in May, a panel of circuit judges appeared divided about whether the trial court had made the right call.

South Carolina says the National Nuclear Security Administration is still racking up fines, and that the agency by now owes twice what the state sued for in 2016. Federal law entitles South Carolina $1 million a day in fines, up to $100 million a year, for every day past Jan. 1, 2016 that DOE doesn’t remove plutonium from the state.

There are about 10 tons of surplus plutonium stored at Savannah River now, all of which was brought there under a seemingly defunct agreement with Russia. Under that agreement on which the U.S. says it will still make good, the NNSA agreed to process a total of 34 metric tons of surplus weapon-usable plutonium for disposal. 

The agency did remove 1 metric ton of that plutonium from Savannah River between 2018 and 2019, under order from a federal judge in a separate lawsuit filed by South Carolina. Half that plutonium went to the Nevada National Security Site, and the other half was supposed to go to Pantex, though the NNSA did not confirm t did.

However, the NNSA does not plan to begin removing the bulk of the weapon-usable surplus plutonium at Savannah River Site from South Carolina until 2028 — six years after the existing deadline in federal law to remove all such plutonium from the state. 

In 2028, the agency expects it will begin the main, decades-long phase of its Surplus Plutonium Disposition Program: an effort to blend all the surplus fissile material up with an inert, concrete-like mixture at Savannah River, then ship the mixture to New Mexico for deep-underground burial at DOE’s Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.
The NNSA originally planned to turned the surplus plutonium into commercial reactor fuel using the partially built Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility at Savannah River, but the agency in 2018 terminated that program and intends to convert the facility into a factory to cast cores for new nuclear warheads.

Comments are closed.

Partner Content
Social Feed

NEW: Via public records request, I’ve been able to confirm reporting today that a warrant has been issued for DOE deputy asst. secretary of spent fuel and waste disposition Sam Brinton for another luggage theft, this time at Las Vegas’s Harry Reid airport. (cc: @EMPublications)

DOE spent fuel lead Brinton accused of second luggage theft.



by @BenjaminSWeiss, confirming today's reports with warrant from Las Vegas Metro PD.

Waste has been Emplaced! 🚮

We have finally begun emplacing defense-related transuranic (TRU) waste in Panel 8 of #WIPP.

Read more about the waste emplacement here: https://wipp.energy.gov/wipp_news_20221123-2.asp

Load More