Nuclear Security & Deterrence Monitor Vol. 24 No. 14
Visit Archives | Return to Issue
PDF
Nuclear Security & Deterrence Monitor
Article 10 of 16
April 03, 2020

DNFSB Urges Staff to Delve Deeper Into Nuke Sites

By ExchangeMonitor

The Defense Nuclear Safety Facilities Board (DNFSB) is urging its inspectors and staff to press their newly bolstered authority to inspect Department of Energy defense-nuclear sites, as codified by Congress last year.

Congress, at least in the board’s interpretation, used the National Defense Authorization Act of 2020 to short-circuit DOE Order 140.1, which was written by then-Deputy Secretary of Energy Dan Brouillette, who in December became Secretary of Energy Dan Brouillette.

In the May 2018 directive, DOE said the DNFSB could not include DOE contractors and employees in board safety recommendations, that certain DOE facilities were off-limits to inspectors, and that Energy Department personnel could only talk to the board after receiving direction from headquarters about what to say.

Congress, however, modified the Atomic Energy Act to clarify that “there are no exceptions to Board’s right of access” to DOE sites and personnel, with the continuing exception of those working at naval nuclear reactor facilities, the board stated in the memo. All three serving DNFSB board members, Chairman Bruce Hamilton, Joyce Connery, and Jessie HIll Roberson, approved the document on March 19.  The memo was made public this week.

The memo tells DNFSB inspectors and staff that Congress’ recent changes to the law confirms the DNFSB’s legal mandate “includes public employees and contractors at defense nuclear facilities,” and that board personnel may inspect “all defense nuclear facilities regardless of hazard categorization.”

Order 140.1 said the DNFSB should not inspect facilities designated as Hazard Category 3, which in the Energy Department’s opinion contain no hazards that could reach the boundaries of facility.

Congress created the DNFSB in 1989 to make health and safety recommendations for DOE defense nuclear sites, active and shuttered, with which the secretary of energy must publicly agree or disagree. The board employees around 100 full-time staff, a handful of whom work in the field, on a roughly $30 million annual budget.

The Energy Department, meanwhile, has finished a draft revision of Order 140.1. The DNFSB has said these revisions, which are not yet public, satisfy some of its concerns about the at-times tumultuous relationship between the two federal agencies. Besides revising Order 140.1, the DNFSB wants a bilateral memorandum of understanding with DOE that cements the board’s access to facilities and personnel.

In congressional testimony in February, Brouillette said he believes DNFSB is an advisory board, and that DOE, as the sole regulator of defense nuclear sites, is alone responsible for protecting its workforce from the hazards of those sites.

Amid the continuing tension between the agency and the board, the March 19 memo urges DNFSB staff to “remain cognizant of their need to promptly engage [DNFSB] management in the event of any unusual delays so issues can be elevated, as appropriate.”

Comments are closed.

Partner Content
Social Feed

NEW: Via public records request, I’ve been able to confirm reporting today that a warrant has been issued for DOE deputy asst. secretary of spent fuel and waste disposition Sam Brinton for another luggage theft, this time at Las Vegas’s Harry Reid airport. (cc: @EMPublications)

DOE spent fuel lead Brinton accused of second luggage theft.



by @BenjaminSWeiss, confirming today's reports with warrant from Las Vegas Metro PD.

Waste has been Emplaced! 🚮

We have finally begun emplacing defense-related transuranic (TRU) waste in Panel 8 of #WIPP.

Read more about the waste emplacement here: https://wipp.energy.gov/wipp_news_20221123-2.asp

Load More