The conventional wisdom among Republicans advocating modernizing the nation’s nuclear weapons complex is that investments in the weapons complex are necessary to allow the nation to reduce its nuclear weapons arsenal. But a former Obama Administration official said late last week that the reverse is also true, and he suggested that existing support among Democrats for modernization could slip away if Republicans continue to block further stockpile reductions. “The Administration made clear that we view investments in the complex as a way to get to lower numbers of nuclear weapons we need to shift away from existing nuclear weapons that we don’t need to a responsive infrastructure,” said Jon Wolfsthal, the Deputy Director at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies and a former director on the National Security Council for nonproliferation. “But it’s increasingly clear that politically unless you have reductions of some kind you’re not going to be able to sustain support in the Congress from progressive sides to fund the complex which we know we desperately need.”
RadWaste Monitor Vol. 13 No. 11
Visit Archives | Return to Issue PDF
Visit Archives | Return to Issue PDF
Morning Briefing
Article of 9
March 17, 2014
COULD DEM SUPPORT FOR MODERNIZATION DISAPPEAR WITHOUT FURTHER REDUCTIONS?
Speaking on the sidelines of an event at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, D.C., last week, Wolfsthal characterized the types of reductions being considered as “very reasonable.” Obama is expected to soon decide on nuclear force structure options that come about as a result of the Nuclear Posture Review Implementation Study. Published reports have indicated that the Administration is considering reductions as low as 300 strategic deployed weapons, but most experts believe any reductions would not go below 1,000. “There is nothing risky about them,” Wolfsthal said of the reductions. “But not funding the complex is riskier than any level of cuts that we’re considering.”
Partner Content
Jobs