RadWaste Vol. 8 No. 45
Visit Archives | Return to Issue PDF

RadWaste Monitor

Article 8 of 8

December 04, 2015

Correction

By Chris Schneidmiller

The Nov. 20 edition of RadWaste Monitor misidentified the manager of a LLRW disposal site in Beatty, Nev. The state of Nevada manages the site. The article also misattributed fines the EPA issued in 2010. The fines relate to an adjacent US Ecology RCRA facility.

Comments are closed.

Weapons Complex Vol. 26 No. 39
Visit Archives | Return to Issue PDF

Weapons Complex Monitor

Article 14 of 14

October 16, 2015

Correction

By Brian Bradley

A story in the Oct. 9 edition of Weapons Complex Monitor incorrectly stated that River Corridor Cleanup contractor Washington Closure Hanford was set this week to start conventional outdoor demolition of 324 Building at the Hanford Site. Neither Washington Closure Hanford, nor any other contractor, is starting or authorized to begin demolition of the 324 Building.

Comments are closed.

Weapons Complex Vol. 26 No. 38
Visit Archives | Return to Issue PDF

Weapons Complex Monitor

Article 2 of 15

October 10, 2015

Correction

By Brian Bradley

In the Oct. 2 edition of Weapons Complex Monitor, an article about the reopening of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant incorrectly stated that Panel 7 will no longer require people to wear “additional” radiological protection equipment, yet it is and will remain posted as a “contamination area.” In actuality, the pathway to Panel 7 no longer requires protective gear, but Panel 7 itself is and will remain posted as a contamination area.

Comments are closed.

Nuclear Security & Deterrence Vol. 19 No. 33
Visit Archives | Return to Issue PDF

Nuclear Security & Deterrence Monitor

Article 16 of 16

September 04, 2015

Correction

By Brian Bradley

An article in the Aug. 28 edition of the Nuclear Security & Deterrence Monitor should have said that Sandia Corp. did not admit to wrongdoing in accepting a Department of Justice settlement regarding alleged lobbying of members of Congress. NS&D Monitor regrets the error.

Comments are closed.

RadWaste Vol. 8 No. 30
Visit Archives | Return to Issue PDF

RadWaste Monitor

Article 7 of 7

July 31, 2015

Correction

By Jeremy Dillon

An article appearing in the July 23 edition of RW Monitor incorrectly connected a possible part 61 rule update involving TRU waste to the current part 61 update focused on Site Specific Assessment (SSA) rulemaking, begun in 2009 to address disposal of large quantities of depleted uranium. Each Part 61 rule update if enacted would exist separate from one another. RW Monitor regrets the error.

Comments are closed.

Nuclear Security & Deterrence Vol. 19 No. 13
Visit Archives | Return to Issue PDF

Nuclear Security & Deterrence Monitor

Article 20 of 20

March 27, 2015

CORRECTION

By Todd Jacobson

A March 20 story incorrectly noted that Vice Adm. Mike Shoemaker was relieved of his duties as commander of U.S. Pacific Fleet’s Naval Air Force (CNAP). The Internet version of the story was corrected on March 24 to show that Capt. Heather Cole was relieved of her duties as commander of Strategic Communications Wing 1 and Task Force 124. NS&D Monitor regrets the error.

Comments are closed.

GHG Reduction Technologies Monitor Vol. 10 No. 11
Visit Archives | Return to Issue PDF

GHG Reduction Technologies Monitor

Article 9 of 9

March 13, 2015

Correction

By Abby Harvey

GHG Monitor
3/13/2015

An article in the March 6 issue of GHG Monitor incorrectly stated that NRG Energy reported a year end adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization [EBITDA] of $3.1 million, compared to a year end EBITDA in 2013 of $2.6 million. The correct figures are $3.1 billion and $2.6 billion, respectively. GHG Monitor regrets the error.

Comments are closed.

Weapons Complex Vol. 26 No. 1
Visit Archives | Return to Issue PDF

Weapons Complex Monitor

Article 16 of 16

January 09, 2015

Correction

By Mike Nartker

WC Monitor
1/9/2015

An article in the Dec. 19, 2014, edition of WC Monitor incorrectly stated that the Reduction-Oxidation Plant at Hanford was the last processing plant built at the Hanford site. The REDOX plant was the fourth of five canyons built at the site and the last canyon built at the Central Plateau’s 200 West area. WC Monitor regrets the error.

Comments are closed.

GHG Reduction Technologies Monitor Vol. 9 No. 45
Visit Archives | Return to Issue PDF

GHG Reduction Technologies Monitor

Article 12 of 12

December 05, 2014

Correction

By Abby Harvey

GHG Monitor
12/5/2014

An article in the Nov. 21 issue of GHG Monitor incorrectly stated that legislation recently proposed by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) would institute a fee of 42 per ton of carbon emitted. The fee would be applied to carbon dioxide, not carbon. GHG Monitor regrets the error.

Comments are closed.

Weapons Complex Vol. 25 No. 40
Visit Archives | Return to Issue PDF

Weapons Complex Monitor

Article 1 of 13

October 17, 2014

Correction

By Mike Nartker

WC Monitor
10/17/2014

An article in the Oct. 10 edition of WC Monitor incorrectly reported that the Department of Energy failed to empty waste from 13 of the 16 C Farm single-shell tanks at Hanford by the end of Fiscal Year 2014. DOE did empty the waste from the 13 tanks by the end of FY 2014. WC Monitor regrets the error.

Comments are closed.

GHG Reduction Technologies Monitor Vol. 9 No. 34
Visit Archives | Return to Issue PDF

GHG Reduction Technologies Monitor

Article 10 of 11

September 12, 2014

Correction

By Abby Harvey

GHG Monitor
9/12/2014

An article in the Sept. 5 issue of GHG Monitor incorrectly identified Oct. 8 as the end date to submit responses to a Request for Information issued by the Department of Energy’s Office of Fossil Energy concerning advanced post-combustion carbon capture technologies that are ready to be tested at a large pilot scale. The correct end date for the response period is Oct. 3. GHG Monitor regrets the error.

Comments are closed.

Weapons Complex Vol. 25 No. 29
Visit Archives | Return to Issue PDF

Weapons Complex Monitor

Article 15 of 15

July 18, 2014

Correction

By Mike Nartker

WC Monitor
7/18/2014

An editorial in the July 11 issue of Weapons Complex Monitor incorrectly stated that when asked who in the Department of Energy is in charge of recovery activities at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, New Mexico Environment Department Secretary Ryan Flynn named DOE Office of Environmental Management Deputy Assistant Secretary for Waste Management Frank Marcinowski. Instead, Flynn said DOE Carlsbad Field Office Manager Joe Franco is leading the WIPP recovery along with Bob McQuinn, president of WIPP managing contractor Nuclear Waste Partnership. Flynn said that Marcinowski is the state’s main contact in DOE headquarters on WIPP and other waste issues across the DOE complex. WC Monitor regrets the error.

Comments are closed.

Weapons Complex Vol. 25 No. 27
Visit Archives | Return to Issue PDF

Weapons Complex Monitor

Article 20 of 20

July 03, 2014

Correction

By Mike Nartker

WC Monitor
7/3/2014

An article in the June 27 issue of Weapons Complex Monitor incorrectly listed the name of the incumbent environmental services contractor at the Nevada National Security Site as Navarro Nevada Environmental Services. The correct name is Navarro-INTERA, Inc. WC Monitor regrets the error.

Comments are closed.

RadWaste Vol. 7 No. 14
Visit Archives | Return to Issue PDF

RadWaste Monitor

Article 4 of 12

May 29, 2014

CORRECTION

By ExchangeMonitor

In the April 4, 2014 issue of RadWaste Monitor, the “Wrap Up” section included a mistake concerning the amount awarded in an Army Corps of Engineers contract for the decommissioning of the MH-1A nuclear reactor currently installed on the STURGIS barge. The story said the contract was worth approximately $37.7 million. The correct amount for the contract should have said approximately $34.7 million. RW Monitor regrets the error.

Comments are closed.

RadWaste Vol. 7 No. 8
Visit Archives | Return to Issue PDF

RadWaste Monitor

Article 1 of 11

May 29, 2014

CORRECTION

By ExchangeMonitor

CORRECTION:

In the Feb. 21, 2014 issue of RadWaste Monitor, the article “NRC Issues SRM for Part 61” included a mistake concerning the dose of radiation allowed in the intruder analysis assessment. The story said that dose limit would be set at 25 mrem/year, which was incorrect. The correct dose limit should have been reported as 500 mrem/year. The 25mrem/year dose limit refers to 1000 year compliance period. RW Monitor regrets the error.

Comments are closed.

March 17, 2014

CORRECTION

By ExchangeMonitor

07/13/12

A July 6 story in GHG Monitor (Vol. 7 Issue 28) incorrectly refers to Southern Company’s Plant Barry facility in Bucks, Ala., as the host site for the Department of Energy’s National Carbon Capture Center. The NCCC is housed near Alabama Power’s Gaston power plant in Wilsonville, Ala. GHG Monitor regrets this error.

Comments are closed.

Nuclear Security & Deterrence Monitor Vol. 27 No. 19
Visit Archives | Return to Issue PDF

Morning Briefing

Article of 8

March 17, 2014

CORRECTION

By ExchangeMonitor

A story in the March 16 edition of Weapons Complex Monitor headlined “EM KICKS OFF FY 2014-2018 BUDGET PLANNING PROCESS” included a typo that suggested the Department of Energy’s FY13 budget request for the Office of Environmental Management is noncompliant. That is incorrect. The quote from a DOE budget planning memo should have read: “We are trying to ascertain the degree to which EM may be non-compliant in FY 2014 and in the out-years, assuming FY 2013 flat funding.” WC Monitor regrets the error.

Comments are closed.